<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Labs &#187; haudio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://labs.creativecommons.org/category/haudio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://labs.creativecommons.org</link>
	<description>by Creative Commons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:29:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Metadata work of interest</title>
		<link>http://labs.creativecommons.org/2007/08/03/metadata-work-of-interest/</link>
		<comments>http://labs.creativecommons.org/2007/08/03/metadata-work-of-interest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 05:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[haudio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metadata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microformats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ramm.x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rdf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rdfa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techblog.creativecommons.org/2007/08/03/metadata-work-of-interest/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of these could turn out to be interesting for describing licensed content on the web, all rather interesting.
hAudio proposed microformat.
Proposed hAudio to RDFa mapping.
RDFa-deployed Multimedia Medata (ramm.x) may be an effort to map and standardize use of existing and upcoming media description standards in RDFa &#8230; I had to skim &#8220;ramm.x in 10 sec&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of these could turn out to be interesting for describing licensed content on the web, all rather interesting.</p>
<p><a href="http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-proposal">hAudio</a> proposed microformat.</p>
<p>Proposed <a href="http://wiki.digitalbazaar.com/en/HAudio_RDFa">hAudio to RDFa mapping</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://sw.joanneum.at/rammx/">RDFa-deployed Multimedia Medata</a> (ramm.x) may be an effort to map and standardize use of existing and upcoming media description standards in RDFa &#8230; I had to skim &#8220;ramm.x in 10 sec&#8221; and &#8220;what ramm.x is NOT&#8221; a few times to gather that, but the key description on that page seems to be:</p>
<blockquote><dl>
<dt>Does ramm.x replace RDF-based multimedia vocabularies, as, e.g., the <a href="http://musicontology.com/">Music Ontology Specification</a>?</dt>
<dd> 	No! ramm.x aims at bringing existing formats, as MPEG-7 and the like, into the Semantic Web. It acts as a bridge using a  	<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/XGR-vocabularies/#formal">certain formalisation</a>	of an existing vocabulary.</dd>
</dl>
</blockquote>
<p>Getting a bit more esoteric, <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/powder-grouping/">Protocol for Web Description Resources (POWDER)</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>facilitates the publication of descriptions of multiple resources such as all those available from a Web site.</p></blockquote>
<p>Which is a bit of an understatement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://labs.creativecommons.org/2007/08/03/metadata-work-of-interest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
